ECONOMIC
Original Paper
UDC 332.025:332.12:338.2 © Ya.Yu. Bondareva, 2024
ISSN 0041-5790 (Print) • ISSN 2412-8333 (Online) • Ugol’ – Russian Coal Journal, 2024, № 3, pp. 74-78
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2024-3-74-78
Title
STRUCTURAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROXIMITY AND ITS IMPACT ON SPATIAL AND NETWORK INTERACTION OF REGIONS
Authors
Ya.Yu. Bondareva 1.
1 Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation,, e-mail: Bondareva_ya@bsu.edu.ru
Authors Information
Bondareva Ya.Yu. – PhD (Economic), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Applied Economics and Economic Security, Belgorod State National Research University, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation, e-mail: Bondareva_ya@bsu.edu.ru
Abstract
The article analyzes approaches to the study of structural and technological proximity and the possibility of its influence on the formation of stable spatial and network interactions between regions. The methodological tools for assessing the structural and technological proximity of regions by means of calculating the coefficients of non-spatial proximity of the regions of the Russian Federation are proposed. On the example of the Belgorod region, the coefficient of structural and technological proximity in relation to other regions of the Russian Federation is calculated, and the analysis of measurements of structural and technological proximity is carried out. Based on the data obtained, the typologization of regions with a high probability of the emergence of stable spatial-network interactions based on the flow of knowledge, technology, capital was carried out.
Keywords
Structural and technological proximity, spatial and network interaction, knowledge flows, typologization of regions, regions of the Russian Federation.
References
1. Березиков С.А., Цукерман В.А. Теоретико-методологические подходы к исследованию процесса технологической трансформации территорий Арктики минерально-сырьевой направленности // Экономика в промышленности. 2015. № 2. С. 47–52.
Berezikov S.A., Zukerman V.A. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of the process of technological transformation of the territories of the Arctic mineral resource orientation. Economika v promyshlennosti. 2015;(2):47-52.
2. Бондарева Я.Ю. Исследование феномена пространственной близости регионов РФ // Экономика. Информатика. 2022. № 49(2). С. 209–216.
Bondareva Ya.Yu. Investigation of the phenomenon of spatial proximity of the regions of the Russian Federation. Economika. Informatika. 2022;49(2):209–216.
3. Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. Cross-firm inventors and social networks: localised knowledge spillovers revisited. Annals of Economics and Statistics. 2005;79(80):189–209.
4. Канева М.А., Унтура Г.А., Морошкина О.Н. Феномен структурно-технологической близости и перетоки знаний в регионах России // Экономика региона. 2020. № 16(4). С. 1254-1271.
Kaneva M.A., Untura G.A., Moroshkina O.N. The phenomenon of structural and technological proximity and knowledge flows in the regions of Russia. Economika regiona. 2020;16(4):1254-1271.
5. Клейнер Г.Б., Рыбачук М.А. Системная сбалансированность экономики России. Региональныйразрез // Экономикарегиона. 2019. Т. 15. Вып. 2. С. 309–323.
Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A. Systemic balance of the Russian economy. Regionalsection. Economika regiona. 2019;15(2):309-323.
6. Пешина Э.В. Авдеев П.А. Формирование валовой добавленной стоимости высокотехнологичной и наукоемкой продукции (товаров, услуг) // Известия УрГЭУ. 2013. № 6 (50). С. 46–56.
Peshina E.V., Avdeev P.A. Formation of gross value added of high-tech and high-tech products (goods, services). IzvestiyaUSUE. 2013;6(50):46-56.
7. Регионы России. Социально-экономические показатели. М.: Росстат, 2022. 1124 с.
8. Татаркин А.И. Региональная направленность экономической политики Российской Федерации как института пространственного обустройства территорий // Экономика региона. 2016. № 1. С. 9–27.
Tatarkin A.I. Regional orientation of the economic policy of the Russian Federation as an institution of spatial arrangement of territories. Economikaregiona. 2016;(1):9-27.
9. Унтура Г.А., Канева М.А., Заболотский А.А. Влияние науки, инноваций и концентрации производства на экономический рост регионов России // Национальные интересы. Приоритетыибезопасность. 2019. № 12. Т. 15. С. 2327–2343.
Untura G.A., Kaneva M.A., Zabolotsky A.A. The influence of science, innovation and concentration of production on the economic growth of the regions of Russia. Natsionalnye Interesy. Prioritety i bezopasnost. 2019;12(15): 2327-2343.
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out within the framework of the state assignment of National Research University "BelSU" FZWG-2023-0014, the topic of the project "Spatial and network interaction of Russian regions in the context of new challenges of technological development".
For citation
Bondareva Ya.Yu. Structural and technological proximity and its impact on spatial and network interaction of regions. Ugol’. 2024;(3): 74-78. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2024-3-74-78.
Paper info
Received October 31, 2023
Reviewed February 15, 2024
Accepted February 26, 2024
