SUBSOIL USE
Original Paper
UDC 336.201:622.271.3© A.A. Khoreshok, T.A. Tyuleneva, O.I. Litvin, Ya.O. Litvin, S.O. Markov, 2023
ISSN 0041-5790 (Print) • ISSN 2412-8333 (Online) • Ugol’ – Russian Coal Journal, 2023, № 10, pp. 42-46
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2023-10-42-46
Title
MINING EQUIPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY AS FACTORS INFLUENCING THE TAX CALCULATION OF SUBSOIL USERS
Authors
Khoreshok A.A.
1, Tyuleneva T.A.
1,2, Litvin O.I.
1, Litvin Ya.O.
3, Markov S.O.
4
1T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University, Kemerovo, 650000, Russian Federation
2Branch of T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University in Prokopyevsk, Prokopyevsk, 653049, Russian Federation
3Branch of JSC «UK Kuzbassrazrezugol» Mokhovsky Open Pit Mine, Mokhovo settlement, Belovsky district, 652661, Russian Federation
4Branch of T.F. Gorbachev Kuzbass State Technical University in Mezhdurechensk, Mezhdurechensk, 652881, Russian Federation
Authors Information
Khoreshok A.A., Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor, e-mail: haa.omit@kuzstu.ru
Tyuleneva T.A., PhD (Economic), Associate Professor, e-mail: krukta@mail.ru,e-mail: kta.bua@kuzstu.ru
Litvin O.I., PhD (Engineering), Associate Professor, e-mail: litvinoi@kuzstu.ru
Litvin Ya.O., PhD (Engineering), Director, e-mail: litvinyao@kuzstu.ru
Markov S.O., PhD (Engineering), Associate Professor, e-mail: markovso@kuzstu.ru
Abstract
One of the significant contradictions between representatives of the expert community of the State Commission on Reserves and subsoil users (in fact – coal producers), is their contradictory approach to calculating coal losses during mining operations. The situation is complicated by the fact that the main regulatory document – "Guidelines for the rationing of planning and economic evaluation of coal losses in the subsoil of the Kuznetsk Basin" – is significantly outdated and does not fully reflect the diversity of mining and geological conditions of mining, their complexity, which directly affects the technical and economic performance of the mining company, as well as the types of excavation and loading equipment used. In this article the authors emphasize the need to update the existing regulatory framework, taking into account these factors.
Keywords
Open-pit mining, Taxation, Excavation and loading equipment, Calculation of coal losses, Mining tax, Mining and geological conditions.
References
1. Litvin O.I., Khoreshok A.A., Litvin Ya.O., Tyuleneva T.A. & Tyulenev M.A. Synergetic approach to improvement taxation based on accounting of technological and economic aspects of open-pit mining. Ugol’, 2022, (1), pp. 4-7. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2022-1-4-7.
2. Tyuleneva T.A. Improving the taxation of subsoil users of a mining region (a case study of Kemerovo Oblast) // Vestnik Kuzbasskogo gosudarstvennogo tehniсheskogo universiteta, ?konomika, 2019, (48), pp. 114-126. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17223/19988648/48/9.
3. Katsubin A.V., Khoreshok A.A., Tyulenev M.A. & Markov S.O. Technology of advance cutting of sloping and steeply pitching coal seams using hy-draulic backhoe excavators. Mining Informational and Analytical Bulletin, 2020, (11), pp. 27–36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25018/0236-1493-2020-11-0-27-36.
4. Martyanov V., Kolesnikov V. & Lapaev M. Investigation of drilling and blasting works parameters for the combined technology of open pit mining of inclined deposits. Journal of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, (3), pp. 53-78. DOI: 10.26730/2618-7434-2022-3-53-78.
5. Murko E., Jano?ko J., Makridin E. & Kapko M. On the need to consider the lithological composition of overburden rocks in the design of waste water treatment plants at open pit mines. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, (315), 02013. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131502013.
6. Bosikov I., Klyuev R., Tavasiev V. & Gobeev M. Influence of transport and road complex on the natural-technical system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020, (918), 012223.
7. Janosevic D., Mitrev R., Andjelkovic B. & Petrov P. Quantitative measures for as-sessment of the hydraulic excavator digging efficiency. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A, 2012. (13), pp. 926-942. DOI: 10.46544/AMS.v27i2.02
8. Loginov E.V. & Tyuleneva T.A. Control of quarry parameters to improve the efficiency of hydraulic backhoes. Ugol’, 2021, (12), pp. 6-10. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2021-12-6-10.
9. Nieto A. & Muncher B. An applied economic assessment and value maximisation of a mining operation based on an iterative cut-off grade optimisation algorithm. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering, 2021, (12), pp. 309-326.
10. Martyanov V.L., Markov S.O., Kolesnikov V.F. et al. Study of inclined deposits opening under the combined mining system: Kureinsky area case-study. Journal of Mining and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, (4), pp. 64-88. DOI: 10.26730/2618-7434-2021-4-64-88.
11. Guidelines for standardization, planning and economic assessment of coal losses in the subsoil in the Kuznetsk basin. (open-pit mining), Leningrad, 1991. (In Russ.).
12. Khoreshok A.A., Dubinkin D.M., Markov S.O. et al. Reduction of coal losses in operation of mining rope shovels // Gornaya promyshlennost?, 2022, (6), pp. 88-94. (In Russ.). DOI 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-6-88-94.
13. Daneshmend L., Hendricks C., Wu S. & Scoble M. Design of a mining shovel simulator. Innovative mine design for the 21st century, Baiden and Archibald eds., Kingston, Ont., Canada, 1993, pp. 551-561.
14. Koivo A.J., Thoma M., Kocaoglan E. & Andrade-Cetto J. Modeling and control of excavator dynamics during digging operation. J. Aerosp. Eng., 1996, (9), pp. 10-18.
15. Vaha P.K. & Shibniewski M.J. Dynamic model of excavator. J. Aerosp. Eng., 1990, (6), pp. 148-166.
For citation
Khoreshok A.A., Tyuleneva T.A., Litvin O.I., Litvin Ya.O. & Markov S.O. Mining equipment and technology as factors influencing the tax calculation of subsoil users. Ugol’, 2023, (10), pp. 42-46. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2023-10-42-46.
Paper info
Received April 15, 2023
Reviewed September 14, 2023
Accepted September 26, 2023
