hi boy
"Ugol" magazin

ECONOMIC OF MINING


Original Paper

UDC 658.51:338.242.2 © M.V. Dobrokhotova, 2022

ISSN 0041-5790 (Print) • ISSN 2412-8333 (Online) • Ugol’ – Russian Coal Journal, 2022, № 9, pp. 34-40

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2022-9-34-40

Title

SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE RUSSIAN COAL INDUSTRY'S TRANSITION TO THE BEST AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGIES

Authors

Dobrokhotova M.V.1

1Federal State Autonomous Institute ‘Environmental Industrial Policy Centre’, Moscow, 115054б, Russian Federation

Authors Information

Dobrokhotova M.V., Deputy Director, e-mail: m.dobrokhotova@eipc.center

Abstract

The climate and environmental agendas have been actively developing in the world over the past decade within the framework of the fourth energy transition. Various states introduce legislative requirements for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These requirements present a serious challenge for the Russian coal industry. The key mechanism for the industrial decarbonisation lies in implementation of cost-effective projects aimed at increasing the production resource efficiency. In order to begin initiating such projects and providing state support to the pilot companies, it is necessary to develop a set of criteria based on the principles of the best available techniques (BAT). The article analyses the Russian coal industry transition to BAT, including not just coal mining, but also its handling (transshipment) as well as various areas of the technological use of coal – from energy generation to coal gasification and coal chemical technology. The author emphasises the important role of Russian Guidance Documents on Best Available Techniques for establishing objective indicators characterising development of the coal industry and considering carbon intensity of technological processes. These indicators are needed to substantiate preferential regulatory decisions.

Keywords

Best Available Techniques, Resource efficiency, Carbon intensity, Industrial policy, Indicative carbon intensity values, Coal mining and preparation, Coal application and transhipment, Economic growth.

References

1. Smil Vaclav. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2010.

2. Laird Frank N. Against transitions? Uncovering Conflicts in Changing Energy Systems. Science as Culture, 2013. (22).

3. Guliev I.A. & Solovova Yu.V. Energy Transition: Concept and Historical Analysis. Features of the Current Energy Transition. Vestnik Altaiskoj Academii economiki i prava, 2021, (10), pp. 98-1054. (In Russ).

4. Kazakov V.B., Kalacheva L.V., Petrov I.В. & Surat I.L. Coal industry development in the situation of high-performance jobs creation, conversion to the best available technologies and import substitution. Ugol’, 2017, (6), pp. 48-50. (In Russ). DOI:10.18796/0041-5790-2017-6-48-50.

5. Manturov D.V. On the Industrial Policy of Russia for the Future 2018-2030. Vestnik MGIMO, 2018, (4), pp.7–22. (In Russ).

6. Skobelev D.O. & Uchenov A.A. The Potential for Applying the Concept of Best Available Techniques For Decision-Making on State Support for the Real Sector of the Russian Economy in the Context of the Global Energy Transition. Экономикаустойчивогоразвития. Economika ustojchivogo razvitiya, 2021, (4), pp.168-179. (In Russ).

7. Federal Law No 219-FZ of 21 July 2014 ‘On Amendments to the Federal Law on Environmental Protection and Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation’. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901808297#64U0IK (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

8. Executive Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No 2674-r of 24 December 2014 on Approval of Application Areas for the Best Available Techniques. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/420242884#6540IN (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

9. Vartanov A.Z., Petrov I.V. & Fedash A.V. Development of institutes of Eurasian technical and economic cooperation in the field of exploration, extraction and processing of solid minerals. Gornyj zhurnal, 2017, (11), pp. 14-17.

10. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No 2398 of 31 December 2020 on Approval of Criteria for Classifying Objects with a Negative Impact on the Environment into Categories I, II, III and IV. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/573292854#6540IN (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

11. Skobelev D.O. Developing the System of Environmental and Technological Regulation of Russian Industry: the Next Step. Economika ustojchivogo razvitiya, 2022, (1), pp. 83-89. (In Russ).

12. Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment No 154 of 18 April 2018 On approval of the list of Category I objects with 60% or more negative contribution to the environment in terms of total air and water emissions. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/542623710#6500IL (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

13. Skobelev D.O., Guseva T.V., Chechevatova O.Yu., Sanzharovsky A.Yu., Shchelchkov K.A. & Begak M.V. Сomparative Analysis of the Drawing up and Review of Reference Documents on Best Available Techniques in the European Union and in the Russian Federation (Second Edition). Moscow, Pero Publ., 2018.114 p.

14. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No 620 of 12 August 2010 On Approval of Technical Regulation on Maritime Transport Facilities. [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://login.consultant.ru/link/?req=doc&base=LAW&n=335157&dst=100003 (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

15. Skobelev D.O. & Volosatova А.А. Scientific Rationale for the Development of the "Green" Project Financing Criteria System Designed to Achieve Technological Restoration for the Russian Industry. Economika ustojchivogo razvitiya, 2021, (1), pp. 181-188. (In Russ).

16. Skobelev D.O., Volosatova A.A., Guseva T.V. & Panova S.V. Application of the Best Available Techniques Concept in Various Systems of Green Finance: International Experience and Prospects in the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union. Vestnik Evrazijskoj Nauki, 2022, (14), 36ECVN222. Available at: https://esj.today/PDF/36ECVN222.pdf (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

17. Federal Law No 296-FZ of 02 July 2021 On Greenhouse Gases Emission Reduction. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_388992/ (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

18. Executive Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No 3052-r of 29 October 2021 On Approval of the Strategy for the Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation until 2050. [Electronic resource]. Available at: www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_399657/ (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

19. Bashmakov I.A., Skobelev D.O., Borisov K.B. & Guseva T.V. Benchmarking systems for greenhouse gases specific emissions in steel industry. Чернаяметаллургия. Ferrous Metallurgy. Bulletin of Scientific, Technical and Economic Information, 2021, (77), pp.1071-1086. (In Russ.).

20. National Inventory of not Controlled by the Montreal Protocol Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Sources and Absorption by Greenhouse Gas. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.igce.ru/performance/publishing/reports/ (accessed 15.08.2022). (In Russ).

21. GOST R 113.00.11-2022 Best Available Techniques. The Benchmarking of Specific Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Industries. (In Russ).

22. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) COM (2021) 564 final 2021/0214(COD). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0564 (accessed 15.08.2022).

23. Standard EN 19694-2 Stationary source emissions - Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in energyintensive industries. Part 2: Iron and steel industry.

24. Reimink H. & Maciel F. CO2 Data Collection User Guide, version 10. WSA. Review 2021. Available at: https://www.readkong.com/page/co2-data-collection-user-guide-version-10-review-2021-6519079 (accessed 15.08.2022).

25. Partnership for Market Readiness. A Guide to Greenhouse Gas Benchmarking for Climate Policy Instruments. World Bank, Washington, DC. 2017. Available at: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26848 (accessed 15.08.2022).

26. Corporate GHG Inventorying and Target Setting. Self-Assessment: V1.0. 2020. EPA, Washington, DC. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/corporate-ghg-inventorying-and-target-setting-self-assessment (accessed 15.08.2022).

27. Tudor C. & Sova R. Benchmarking GHG Emissions: Forecasting Models for Global Climate Policy. Electronics. 2021, (10), 3149.

For citation

Dobrokhotova M.V. Specific features of the Russian coal industry's transition to the best available technologies. Ugol’, 2022, (9), pp. 34-40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2022-9-34-40.

Paper info

Received July 10, 2022

Reviewed July 28, 2022

Accepted August 25, 2022

SPECIAL ISSUE




Hot from the press
Partners