ECONOMIC OF MINING
Original Paper
UDC 338.45:622.3:332.012.2 © N.S. Bondarev, G.S. Bondareva, I.A. Ganieva,S.A. Kononova, 2022
ISSN 0041-5790 (Print) • ISSN 2412-8333 (Online) • Ugol’ – Russian Coal Journal, 2022, № S12, pp. 116-119
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18796/0041-5790-2022-S12-116-119
Title
REGIONAL MOBILITY MANAGEMENT OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES
Authors
Bondarev N.S.1, Bondareva G.S.1, Ganieva I.A.2,Kononova S.A.1
1 Kemerovo State University, Kemerovo, 650000, Russian Federation
2 All-Russian Institute of Agrarian Problems and Informatics named after A.A. Nikonov, Moscow, 107078, Russian Federation
Authors Information
Bondarev N.S., Doctor of Economic Sciences, Acting Head of the Department of Quality Management
Bondareva G.S., Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor of the Department of Economic Security
Ganieva I.A., Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Chief Research Associate
KononovaS.A., Candidate of Economic Sciences, Deputy Director of the Institute of Digitalization
Abstract
The article considers the system of regional mobility management of socio-economic processes on the example of the Kemerovo region-Kuzbass, which has its own specifics as a result of deep industrial specialization based on the coal industry. The mobility of the environment of socio-economic processes is methodically determined, taking into account changes in the trends of the coal industry. The need to study the mobility of the environment of socio-economic processes is based on identifying the most susceptible indicators for the transformation of the coal industry. This makes it possible to adjust regional development programs that take into account the adaptation of the economy to current conditions. For the purposes of the study, the environment of socio-economic processes, its main elements related to the coal industry, the variability of social and economic orientation is analytically distributed. The obtained results allowed us to conclude that economic indicators are more mobile than social indicators in relation to changes in socio-economic processes. This makes it possible to adjust social processes to reduce the effects of economic downturns, including the tools of comprehensive scientific and technical programs.
Keywords
Regional management, Mobility, Environment of socio-economic processes, Social process, Economic process, Coal industry, Comprehensive scientific and technical programs.
References
1. Krutikov V.K., Kosogorova L.A., Volkhin S.N. & Sharov S.V. Reform of development institutions as instruments stimulating innovative socio-economic processes. Economics and entrepreneurship, 2020, (11), pp. 266-268. DOI 10.34925/EIP.2020.124.11.048. (In Russ.).
2. Gala P., Rocha I. & Magacho G. The structuralist revenge: Economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572018v38n02a01 (accessed 15.11.2022).
3. Makarenko T.D. & Kovalchuk L.B. Regional socio-economic processes: features of interaction with the external environment / T. D. Makarenko. Fundamental research, 2016, (2-2), pp. 392-396. (In Russ.).
4. Borshchevskaya O.S. Management of integration of residents of territories of advanced development into regional socio-economic processes: theoretical and methodological aspects. Economy: yesterday, today, tomorrow, 2017, Vol. 7, (7A), pp. 152-164. (In Russ.).
5. Abdulazyanov D.E. Transformation of socio-economic processes at the regional level in modern conditions. Horizons of Economics, 2015, (3), pp. 118-121. (In Russ.).
6. Kaplan G. & Violante G. Microeconomical heterogeneity and macroeconomical shocks. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.167 (accessed 15.11.2022).
7. Prokopenko E.V. Management of socio-economic processes in the Donetsk region. Manager. Bulletin of Donetsk State University of Management, 2016, (1), pp. 116-121. (In Russ.).
8. Hong H.K., Hu R., Liao H.P. et al. Differentiation of spatial function in a mountainous rural area from a multi-functional perspective. Shengtai Xuebao, 2017, Vol. 37, (7), pp. 2415-2427. DOI 10.5846/stxb201601030011.
9. Kumar H. & Namrata Socio-economic environment and motivation to innovate: exploring grassroots innovations process in India. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2022. DOI 10.1080/09537325.2022.2088345.
10. Ganieva I.A., Shepelev G.V., Bobylev P.M. & Petrik N.A. Experience and lessons learned in preparing the ‘Clean Coal – Green Kuzbass’ Integrated Scientific and Technical Project. Ugol’, 2022, (11), pp. 17-25. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041- 5790-2022-11-17-25.
11. Bondarev N., Bondareva G., Ravochkin N. & Windemut V. Formation of the institution of environmental responsibility of coal industry enterprises. E3S Web of Conferences, 2019, (14), pp. 04002. DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/201910504002.
12. Tomilin K.V., Kharitonov A. & Bondarev N.S. Technique for Determining the Potential Use of Disturbed Lands for Agriculture in Mining Region. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, (5), pp. 02032. DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202017402032.
Acknowledgements
The work was carried out within the framework of agreement No. 075-15-2022-1195 dated 30.09.2022, concluded between the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and the Federal budgetary educational institution of Higher Education "Kemerovo State University".
For citation
Bondarev N.S., Bondareva G.S., Ganieva I.A.& Kononova S.A.Regional mobility management of socio-economic processes. Ugol’, 2022, (S12), pp. 116-119. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041-5790-2022-S12-116-119.
Paper info
Received November 1, 2022
Reviewed November 15, 2022
Accepted November 30, 2022
